mobile technology: March 2012

Home » Archives for March 2012

Saturday, 31 March 2012

Nokia Lumia 610 Reviews | Technical Specifications

Posted by trickyinsect on March 3rd, 2012 | No Comments

After Nokia has been highlighted this year with its latest model with 41 MP then Nokia also introduces its eye catching model Nokia Lumia 610 with the Windows platform. The mobile has been announced by the concern company but looking for the right time to launch.

Nokia Lumia 610

Along with the charming body structure Nokia Lumia 610 has a large display configured as 3.7 inches having 480 x 800 pixels integrated with TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors that look alluring to make the user more excited. The unlocked cell phone Nokia Lumia 610 would be inherited with the Multitouch and Corning Gorilla Glass protection.

Samsung Galaxy Beam Reviews

Nokia Lumia 610 looked charming with the dimensions 119 x 62 x 12 mm, 77.6 cc and very light weighted 131.5 g as anyone can handle it easily and carry anywhere and feel funky placed in the hands.

As we can see easily Nokia Lumia 610 detriment with respect to its talent of features as compared to Lumia 800 and Lumia 900.

Now day’s storage is a major problem that has to be faced by the mobile lovers Nokia has looked over the matter and provided 8 GB storage, 256 MB RAM but the main disappointment is the card slot, Nokia Lumia 610 does not have any card slot.

Nokia 808 PureView with 41 MP Camera Reviews

Nokia Lumia 610 has combined with the Microsoft and traditionally flavored with the Windows Operating system with Microsoft Windows Phone 7.5 Mango which is same as the latest mobiles with the lower configured processor power as 800 MHz.

Nokia Lumia 610 entertains with the high resolution 5 MP camera and 2592х1944 pixels having face detection feature. The mobile has not supported any kind of secondary camera to make video calling that make impairment with the 3G concept and suffers the advantage of the 3G.

Key Features:

480 x 800 pixels, 3.7 inches (~252 ppi pixel density)5 MP, 2592х1944 pixels, autofocus, LED flashMicrosoft Windows Phone 7.5 Mango8 GB storage, 256 MB RAMSMS (threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IMStereo FM radio with RDS

Latest Cell Phones

trickyinsect

Welcome to the TrickyGeek, the best source to be tricks and reviews on the topics like pc Cell Phone Reviews, Reviews on Gadgets, PC Tricks, SEO Tricks, Blogging Tricks and Many More..

More Posts - Website

Nokia Lumia 900 Reviews | Technical Specifications

Nokia 808 PureView with 41 MP Camera Reviews | Technical Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Beam Reviews | Technical Specifications

ZTE Era Android v4.0 Reviews | Technical Specifications

Samsung versus Nokia - Samsung looking to ship 374 Million Phones in 2012

Tags: Nokia Lumia, Nokia Lumia 610, Nokia Lumia 610 Features, Nokia Lumia 610 Reviews, Nokia Lumia 610 Specifications Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

0 comments

Labels: Lumia, Nokia, Reviews, Specifications, technical

Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 Reviews | Technical Specifications

Posted by trickyinsect on February 21st, 2012 | 5 Comments
SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 and SAMSUNG GALAXY MINI 2 S6500 are the two innovations from Samsung that are recently announced and going to released shortly. SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 is the successor of earlier existing model which I want to prove here on trickygeek.com.
Samsung Galaxy Ace 2
2G and 3G Network: SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 assembled with the supportive nature for both 2G configured as GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 and 3G network with 3G configuration of HSDPA 900 / 2100. SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 may expect to release in this year 2012.
Panasonic Eluga Technical Specifications
Dimensions and Display: SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 comes up with dimensions of 118.3 x 62.2 x 10.5 mm and weighs 122 gm. The mobile has display screen of 3.8 inches which is quite large as compared to with SAMSUNG GALAXY MINI 2 S6500 and have a wide PLS TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors and screen resolutions of 480 x 800 pixels. Multitouch and TouchWiz v3.0 UI is the features provided with the handset.
LG Optimus LTE Tag
Android Platform: Android platform planned to include with the version Android OS, v2.3 which makes similar to the SAMSUNG GALAXY MINI 2 S6500. SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 runs with Dual-core 800 MHz processor which creates a major difference in speed with respect to Mini S6500.
Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos I589
Storage Capacity: SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 maintains a large space to make stuff store for long time such as supported with the internal memory of 4 GB storage, 786MB RAM. The Handset also has the ability to expand the memory upto 32GB.
Motorola DROID 4 XT894 Reviews
Speed Factor: SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 has the much better ability for the speed factors and enhances the speed remarkably. The handset has speed HSDPA, 14.4 Mbps. The Mobiles have the support for GPRS and EDGE. The mobile has microUSB v2.0. It also supports Bluetooth Connectivity of v3.0 with A2DP.
LG Optimus 3D 2 Android Smartphone
Camera Ability: Here ability of camera make a great difference between SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 and SAMSUNG GALAXY MINI 2 S6500 as the current mobile provided with 5 MP, 2592×1944 pixels, autofocus, LED flash rather than 3.15 MP, 2048×1536 pixels of SAMSUNG GALAXY MINI 2 S6500. Geo-tagging, face and smile detection are added flavor for the Ace 2. The handset has the ability to make video recording with 720p@30fps and also include with VGA secondary camera…
trickyinsect
Welcome to the TrickyGeek, the best source to be tricks and reviews on the topics like pc Cell Phone Reviews, Reviews on Gadgets, PC Tricks, SEO Tricks, Blogging Tricks and Many More..
More Posts - Website
Related Posts :Panasonic Eluga Technical Specifications for Dust and Water Proof Smartphone
LG Optimus LTE Tag Upgraded Technical Specifications against LG Optimus LTE
Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos I589 Android Smartphone Technical Specifications
Samsung Galaxy mini 2 S6500 Reviews and Technical Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Pop Plus S5570i Android Smartphone Technical specification
Tags: android mobiles, buy samsung mobiles, galaxy ace 2 features, galaxy ace 2 highlights, galaxy ace 2 Mobiles, galaxy ace 2 reviews, galaxy ace 2 specifications, latest mobiles, samsung galaxy ace 2, samsung unlocked mobiles, Todays hot deals, Unlocked Cell Phones 2 Comments
dave says:February 22, 2012 at 12:21 am
When can we get the SAMSUNG GALAXY ACE 2 in Canada?
Thanks
Oylist
Replytrickyinsect says:February 22, 2012 at 8:06 pm
Hi..
Well this cell phone is announced only and hope it will come in 2012….
trickyinsect recently posted..
Reply3 Trackbacks
LG Optimus 3D Max Reviews | Technical Specifications | Tricky GeekFebruary 22, 2012
[...] Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 Reviews [...]
LG Optimus 4X HD Android v4.0 Reviews | Technical Specifications | Tricky GeekFebruary 23, 2012
[...] Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 Reviews [...]
LG Optimus L7 P700 Reviews | Technical Specification | Tricky GeekFebruary 29, 2012
[...] Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 Reviews [...]
Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Name *
Email *
Website
Comment
You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
« Panasonic Eluga Technical Specifications for Dust and Water Proof SmartphoneLG Optimus 3D Max Reviews | Technical Specifications » SearchTRICKYGEEK ON GOOGLE+JOIN US Follow @trickygeek Mail SubscriptionEnter your email address: Delivered by FeedBurner Useful Links Free Wallpapers And Graphics Free Social Bookmarking Latest Technology Updates Reviews On Movies CategoriesCell PhonesGoogle TricksSEO TricksTechnology And GadgetsTricky NewsTricky Tricks RSS FEEDSamsung Galaxy Beam Reviews | Technical SpecificationsZTE Era Android v4.0 Reviews | Technical SpecificationsNokia 808 PureView with 41 MP Camera Reviews | Technical SpecificationsNokia Lumia 900 Reviews | Technical SpecificationsHTC One X Reviews | Technical SpecificationsSamsung Rugby Smart Reviews | Technical SpecificationsLG Optimus L7 P700 Reviews | Technical SpecificationLG Optimus 4X HD Android v4.0 Reviews | Technical SpecificationsLG Optimus 3D Max Reviews | Technical SpecificationsMetaLog inEntries RSSComments RSSWordPress.org Recent PostsSamsung Galaxy Beam Reviews | Technical SpecificationsZTE Era Android v4.0 Reviews | Technical SpecificationsNokia 808 PureView with 41 MP Camera Reviews | Technical SpecificationsNokia Lumia 900 Reviews | Technical SpecificationsRecent CommentsSamsung Galaxy Beam Reviews | Technical Specifications | Felici on Nokia Lumia 900 Reviews | Technical SpecificationsSamsung Galaxy Beam Reviews | Technical Specifications | Tricky Geek on Nokia 808 PureView with 41 MP Camera Reviews | Technical SpecificationsLG Optimus 3D Max Reviews | Technical Specifications | Tricky Geek on Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos I589 Android Smartphone Technical SpecificationsLG Optimus 4X HD Android v4.0 Reviews | Technical Specifications | Tricky Geek on LG Optimus LTE Tag Upgraded Technical Specifications against LG Optimus LTEPagesAbout UsAdvertise With UsWrite For Us Google Copyright © Tricky Geek - All rights reserved WordPress Theme by TechMaish More in Cell Phones (10 of 68 articles)Panasonic Eluga Technical Specifications for Dust and Water Proof Smartphone Panasonic Eluga is a buckish and a good looking one from the Panasonic. Very large screen and elegant design makes ... Close

0 comments

Labels: Galaxy, Reviews, Samsung, Specifications, technical

Corsair TX vs. OCZ ZT 550W

by Martin Kaffei on 3/26/2012 9:30:00 AM
Posted in Cases/Cooling/PSUs , PSU , Corsair , OCZ , 80Plus Bronze , 550W , ZT , TX Buy the OCZ OCZZT550W Technology ATX12V
$89.99
$20.00 rebate
$89.99
$15.00 rebate
Corsair TX550M vs. OCZ ZT550W 550W
In this review we will compare two almost identical products from OCZ and Corsair. Even so, there are still crucial differences between the offerings. With 550W both PSUs deliver more than enough power for most current systems. On the following pages we'll find out which handle overload situations the best, who has the highest efficiency, and which PSU provides the best voltage regulation.
The ZT models from OCZ are based on a Great Wall design with some modifications in the details. Interesting features include the fully modular cable management and a silent fan control. Today we will review the smallest version with 550W. Here's a complete rundown of the features.
Available in 550W, 650W, 750WSingle +12V railFully Modular Cabling SystemDimensions: 150 x 86 x 175mm (W x L x H)80-Plus Bronze CertifiedMTBF: 100,000 hours5-year warranty140mm ball-bearing fanActive PFCATX 12V 2.2 Compliant
The second unit we test today is a Corsair TX produced by CWT. "Enthusiast Series is designed for reliable operation in high-performance PCs where clean, stable power is important." It's able to deliver the full output power at an ambient temperature of up to 50° Celsius. Like OCZ Corsair uses a double ball-bearing fan. Except the cables with mainboard connectors all cables are modular. In addition the fan grille looks unusual.
Available in 550W, 650W, 750W, 850WSingle +12V railModular Cabling SystemDimensions:150 x 86 x 160mm (W x L x H)80-Plus Bronze CertifiedMTBF: 100,000 hours5-year warranty140mm ball-bearing fanActive PFCATX 12V 2.31 Compliant Corsair TX550M Overview Corsair TX550M vs. OCZ ZT550W 550W Corsair TX550M Overview Corsair TX550M Internal Design and Fan Corsair TX550M Measurements OCZ ZT550W Overview OCZ ZT550W Internal Design and Fan OCZ ZT550W Measurements Comparison Print This Article 34 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment Last Page by Stuka87 on Monday, March 26, 2012 On the last page where things are being highlighted, shouldn't the Corsair be highlighted for efficiency and ripple since it was ahead in these categories? Unless the yellow is just meant to show there is a difference. But it seams in the rest of the areas the better supply is highlighted.

Both supplies look pretty good though, even if priced a bit higher than some similar supplies. Stuka87 Reply RE: Last Page by Martin Kaffei on Monday, March 26, 2012 Sounds more correct, right.
Thanks a lot. Martin Kaffei Reply Quality matters by lyeoh on Monday, March 26, 2012 Has Corsair really improved their quality since: http://www.behardware.com/articles/843-3/component...

FWIW, OCZ and Corsair's nonPSU stuff seem to get returned quite often too:
http://www.behardware.com/articles/843-4/component...
http://www.behardware.com/articles/843-7/component...
http://www.behardware.com/articles/843-8/component...

Both these PSUs might be OK, but why should I care? There are other manufacturers who have a better track record when it comes to quality. Poor quality in a range of similar models is understandable, but poor quality in different types/classes of products just tells me to avoid buying anything from them.

I'd prefer to see more reviews of products from manufacturers that care about quality. Who the heck wants to read reviews of food from restaurants that have a long track record of giving a significant percentage of their customers food poisoning? I don't care how good their food looks.

Are these even significantly cheaper? lyeoh Reply RE: Quality matters by Samus on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 My advice to you is stop reading BEHardware.

Those statistics for every segment they 'measured' are a joke. Just drafting such a distasteful article is a huge lapse in journalism judgement on their part. Nobody in their right mind would gauge component reliability based on return rates over a 6-month period from a single source.

The only way to measure reliability is by reviewing the initial quality in detail and putting the components into real-world scenarios to report any abnormalities over time. AnandTech and other legitimate hardware review sites do this, as does Car & Driver, Consumer Reports, Home Theater Review, Gun Directory, etc Samus Reply RE: Quality matters by seanleeforever on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 while i agree with your point of view, but AnandTech rarely review abnormalities over time. and bear in mind AnandTech is more akin to C&D not CR because AnandTech receives cherry picked product directly from manufactures. and you really have to hope what you buy from your local frys is the same as the one they choose to send for reviewing. seanleeforever Reply RE: RE: Quality matters by lyeoh on Thursday, March 29, 2012 6 month period? OCZ's poor track record goes way back longer than that: http://www.behardware.com/articles/831-7/component...
http://www.behardware.com/articles/831-4/component...
http://www.behardware.com/articles/810-6/component...
http://www.behardware.com/articles/810-4/component...

You haven't even provided a good reason why anyone should care about your opinion on this subject especially since you said "6 month period".

I'd believe BeHardware's article more than I'd believe you, especially since a few simple Google searches for product problems do not disagree with their statistics. So it's not just a freak incident where only the french retailer has higher rate of returns for OCZ and corsair stuff. lyeoh Reply ummm, 550? by fausto412 on Monday, March 26, 2012 I have a 6990 and a n AX850 PSU...that psu gets super hot when gaming. Can't imagine a 550 watt psu not melting. I think the days of the 550 watt psu are over unless you only do single card gaming and don't use the highest end cards. fausto412 Reply RE: ummm, 550? by Ken g6 on Monday, March 26, 2012 Did you miss the GTX 680 review the other day? http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-... The 7970 would work fine with a 550W PSU too.

Also recall that the 6990 is effectively two cards in crossfire on a single board. Ken g6 Reply RE: ummm, 550? by Samus on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 I run a GTX570, Core i7-950, 12GB RAM, 5 hard drives and some other shit off a PCP&C 500-watt PSU. Whole system is reasonably warm after hours of gaming and is completely stable.

Kill-A-Watt has never reported more than 400-watts drawn from the wall, so my 500-watt PSU never even hits 80% load.

Any never system with a single GPU draws less power, I guarantee it. 550-watt is overkill for most people with current technology. Remember most OEM systems still ship with 250-watt PSU's. Samus Reply RE: ummm, 550? by Stuka87 on Monday, March 26, 2012 I use a Antec NEO-ECO 520C with my over clocked 7950 and its perfectly fine. I never get anywhere close to even 400W at peak (And thats with a 4.1GHz Phenom II) when measured at the wall. The latest chips from AMD and nVidia are incredibly efficient. The 6990 is a pretty big power hog comparatively, and it is a dual GPU card. Stuka87 Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 2 3 4 Next » View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! Microsoft Talks Windows 8 Touch Experience on Windows 7 Tablets Novatel MiFi 4620L Jetpack Available on April 12th for $49.99 Google begins Android 4.0.4 Rollout NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Launch Recap AMD Radeon HD 7870 Launch Recap AMD Radeon HD 7850 Launch Recap Jen-Hsun's Email to NVIDIA Employees on a Successful Kepler Launch Microsoft Talks Screen Resolution in Windows 8, Suggests "Retina"-esque Tablets Acer Iconia Tab A510: Tegra 3 Hits $450 Quick Look: ASUS 1025C and Cedar Trail Tested: Battery Life on the new iPad Archos 80 and 101 G9 Turbo 1.5 GHz Available Now In US DailyTech AT&T Says Lumia 900 Launch Will Blow Away the Every iPhone Launch Yet Quick Note: NASA's Remaining Space Shuttles Stripped, Prepared for Final Resting Places Proposed Amendment to Prevent Employers from Asking for Facebook Usernames/Passwords Fails Best Buy Reports Earnings, Announces the Closing of 50 Stores 3/29/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos Locates Apollo 11 F-1 Engines, Looks to Resurrect Them New Estimates Peg the Lifetime Cost of Lockheed F-35 Lightning II at $1.45 Trillion All Windows 8 PCs Will Have 5-Fingered Touch Apple CEO Tim Cook Visits New Foxconn Plant in China, Meets with Vice Premier Li Keqiang NSA: China is Destroying U.S. Economy Via Security Hacks 2013 Ford Explorer "Sport" Airs, Gets EcoBoost Obama Admin. Aims to "Share" Combat Aircraft Training Spectrum MIT Builds 3D Solar Structures Capable of Generating 20 Times the Power Output of Flat Panels Only 82K ASUS Transformer Primes Delivered, Cause Unknown 3/28/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Ford Transit Connect EV Battery Maker Azure Dynamics Files for Bankruptcy Cadillac XTS Luxury Sedan to Get Directional Vibrating Seat Warnings Twitter @gruber @drwave note that you'll exhaust your 5GB monthly data before you drain the iPad's battery (!) @gruber @drwave 25.3 hours on a single charge, maintaining a constant 50KB/s transfer to a WiFi tethered MacBook Air. http://t.co/AKfXa5DO @Javed_Del I really hope ASUS is using all of the Transformer products as a learning experience for a killer Windows 8 version @bamurphymac thank you for reading! @AgentKyle IVB hasn't officially launched yet so we'll still have to wait and see :-P @rammyrameesh let me recover from writing and I'll see if that's a possibility :) @hitechjeff thank you, fixed! Finally done, whew: http://t.co/0yIPIOh6 @guspaz consider it done so very close, yet so very far away…still working on it guys!

Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information

0 comments

Labels: Corsair